Crisis Communication – Peer Review Paper

I need an explanation for this Management question to help me study.

Please Read the following assignment carefully, and literally follow the instructions provided:

Assigment:

“You should have received an email with an attachment (I attached it as “the attachment”) of a (mostly) blinded paper. Every effort was made to assign a different topic than the one you prepared to permit your to expand your horizon of familiarity with crisis communication.

I would expect to receive back from you the marked-up paper, the Grammarly Premium report you ran on the paper (with your analytical critique of that report) and a completed Rubric/RISE response to the author. I am setting up the bins to deposit those products today.

Process: Run the Grammarly Premium report, including the plagiarism tool, with the following “goals”:

Knowledgeable Audience

Formality Formal

Domain Technical

Tone Analytical

Intent Convince

Second: Read the paper and take your notes on what you believe the author is saying. Were they successful? What questions did the paper make you ask?

Third: Read the paper again, with (in word) (Toolbar) Track Changes-ON, and make your comments from this second reading and any editing suggestions on the paper (edits will appear as track changes. For a note to the author, you will need to click “New Comment”

Fourth: Use the RISE Model of Peer Evaluation (attached, back two pages) to formulate CONSTRUCTIVE feedback and additional critique. Note the Bold text is the preferred response from you; the second line represents behavior on the reviewers part that does not meet expectations.

Fifth: using the outlined measurement tool (rubric) of desired performance, check off your assessment for each item identified. Absent of a notation in the performance column will be interpreted as the item is not found, OR the reviewed didn’t make the effort to consider.

Finally, place all three documents (the Track changed document, your interpretation of the Grammarly report, and the Rubric/RISE feedback) in the Assignment tab identified as “Crisis Comm Reviewer Feedback”.

It is my intent to have the Rubric and RISE component with TRACK Changes returned to the author for consideration before final submission of the paper.”

End of Assignment

Additional professor comment:

“Meanwhile, you can choose to perform your first reading of the paper and make notes on the paper using the Word switches; toolbar, review, track changes on. That will highlight any corrections. Using the same toolbar/review/new comment will allow you to place comments on the text in the sidebar.

Look for the Rise Method of Peer Review for your final note to the author.”