help with Essay?

I’m working on a English exercise and need support.

Paper 2 looks at an article in context. Specifically, it looks at how different audiences can change the perceived meaning of a text. You will read “The Art of Branding a Condition” (https://sdsuwriting.pbworks.com/f/Parry+art+of+branding+a+condition.pdf (Links to an external site.)), and you will analyze it’s argument and effectiveness when looking at two different audiences. First, look at the argument as if the intended audience were pharmaceutical companies. What is the author trying to convey to his audience? How well does he make his argument? Summarize through the Toulmin Method and analyze for rhetorical effectiveness. Secondly, look at the article as if its intended audience were the people that the pharmaceutical companies are selling products to. Does the argument change? If so, what is the new argument and how is it created through context? If not, why not? Is the new argument effective? You the Toulmin Method and analyze.

Lastly, compare the rhetorical effectiveness of the two arguments. Which one is more effective/persuasive? What makes one better than the other?

If you’re still struggling with how to analyze, the “Analysis Worksheet,” the “Fallacies Worksheet,” and the “Extra Credit Worksheet” are all here to help. You can also set up office hours with me during the week to go over either the article or what you’ve written so far to see what I would suggest improving.

This paper requires:

5-7 pages

MLA format

help with essay

I need help with a History question. All explanations and answers will be used to help me learn.

Describe the capability, intent, vulnerability, and consequence of a terrorist using the agent you selected in an attack. For example, do terrorist organizations have the capability to produce and deliver a weapon with the agent you selected? Would there be a desire for terrorists to use this biological agent? Would using a biological weapon with the agent you selected produce the intended effects?

Your essay response must be a minimum of 350 words in length, not counting references listed at the end or repeating of the question, and cited per APA guidelines. You are required to use scholarly resources to support your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.

Sites such as Wikipedia, e-how.com, history.com, howthingswork.com, and other similar sources are not scholarly in nature and may not be used for this assignment.

help with Essay?

I’m working on a English exercise and need support.

Paper 2 looks at an article in context. Specifically, it looks at how different audiences can change the perceived meaning of a text. You will read “The Art of Branding a Condition” (https://sdsuwriting.pbworks.com/f/Parry+art+of+branding+a+condition.pdf (Links to an external site.)), and you will analyze it’s argument and effectiveness when looking at two different audiences. First, look at the argument as if the intended audience were pharmaceutical companies. What is the author trying to convey to his audience? How well does he make his argument? Summarize through the Toulmin Method and analyze for rhetorical effectiveness. Secondly, look at the article as if its intended audience were the people that the pharmaceutical companies are selling products to. Does the argument change? If so, what is the new argument and how is it created through context? If not, why not? Is the new argument effective? You the Toulmin Method and analyze.

Lastly, compare the rhetorical effectiveness of the two arguments. Which one is more effective/persuasive? What makes one better than the other?

If you’re still struggling with how to analyze, the “Analysis Worksheet,” the “Fallacies Worksheet,” and the “Extra Credit Worksheet” are all here to help. You can also set up office hours with me during the week to go over either the article or what you’ve written so far to see what I would suggest improving.

This paper requires:

5-7 pages

MLA format