Response to discussion post minimum 100 words

I’m trying to learn for my Law class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

You just basically responding to the student post of what you felt compelling and enlightening.

Student paper down below:

One of the hugest challenges for officials that handle immigration is the number of resources available to process the thousands of immigration cases. As a result, of this the federal government has to ask for help from the state and local government. Many of the local immigration laws that call for background checks and/or allowing public services are usually trumped by federal immigration laws.

Federal laws are created then applied to the states and their citizens. These laws are then bonded into the United States Constitution, which gives the federal government power over all the states. An though the states may assist in immigration enforcement and regulation, it is the federal government that has the full control of enforcing the U.S. immigration laws. Which can result in confusion has how past and future immigration cases are possessed. The federal government has a law that states that if an immigrant commits a felony while on U.S. soil, they will be deported by to the country. But, The U.S. Constitution has a clause, that prevents the state law from interfering or conflicting with the federal immigration laws.

The mirror -image of state enforcement is wonderful—one of the most successful ideas in history. The theory has majority vote that a state carry out federal policy is the Arizona’s Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhood Act, known as the SB 1070. Arizona was known to have “crossed the line” when they decided to regulate the police to check immigration status or if suspect has entered the country illegally, when stopped. Other states have passed similar laws like Oklahoma and Utah, where they do a E-verify check, employment eligibility, voting privileges and impose restrictions on public assistance. The theory has been highly favored by dozens of U.S. senators, representatives, policy groups, private citizens and commentators including Sarah Palin, George Will, and editors of the New York Post and Washington Post.

Currently, to deal with the issues of immigration today, they have come to the idea of building a wall to keep immigrants out of the United States. I personally don’t think this a promising solution to the problem because immigrants would just find other ways to reach land. The wall I feel is just a temporary fix to a long lasting problem, but the current President just wants to be the one to say he fixed the problem or tried to the do something about it.

In a federal republic, there is a division of powers between the national government and the government of individuals, there is no monarch. While each manages their division of powers differently issues of the nation scope are handled at a “federal Level”. The federal republic is used by majority of countries, because it takes almost any form, from aristocracies to democracies.

Response to discussion post minimum 100 words

I’m working on a Law question and need guidance to help me study.

You just basically responding to the student of what you felt compelling and enlightening.

Student paper down below:

Unit 1 Technology and Criminal Justice: In this section we were asked to define non-lethal options and the pros and cons to these methods. I felt that I had a lot of knowledge in this section since I was a Deputy Sheriff and worked for 5 years in a detention facility. While in the facility we were only have OC and a Taser for safety and security. In the facility is were I learned how to effectively communicate with those who’s world has been turned over by being arrested and placed in jail. The Taser and OC spray are very effective tools; however, communication was the key tool for me. As everything in the world evolves so will the technology used in detention facilities and prisons systems.

The next unit I found interesting was Unit 3 Privatization of Justice: This was another subject that I found very interesting since here in Colorado we have a number of Prisons and Detention facilities and some are privatized and others are government operated. The facility I worked in was government run but was slowly privatizing. I see this as a potential problem since the private employees received less pay for doing the same job and the training was also different. I feel that the privatization of these facilities will become a problem in the very near future. The privatization of prison systems will continue to improve and more certified officers can move out to the streets to battle crime and organized criminals.

How did participating in the discussion Boards help during the assignments? The discussion boards were simply another resource for me. The discussion boards allowed me to gain information and knowledge from my fellow peers and their past experiences. If at any time I did not understand the subject all I had to do was read the posts from my peers and any and all questions were answered. The information provided by the instructor as well as the information provided by my peers answered and clarified all assignments.

What approaches could have yielded additional valuable information? This is an online course and in this course most of the information was provided, however because this is an online course the needed information is endless. The only way this course could have been taught differently was to teach it in a classroom so all the students could sit together and talk about the assignment. I feel that the class was taught effectively and efficiently and I would not change the online method. Thank you Dr. Ntepp and my fellow peers for the information and guidance throughout the course. I wish you all well and good luck in everything you do.

Response to discussion post minimum 100 words

I’m trying to learn for my Law class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

You just basically responding to the student post of what you felt compelling and enlightening.

Student paper down below:

One of the hugest challenges for officials that handle immigration is the number of resources available to process the thousands of immigration cases. As a result, of this the federal government has to ask for help from the state and local government. Many of the local immigration laws that call for background checks and/or allowing public services are usually trumped by federal immigration laws.

Federal laws are created then applied to the states and their citizens. These laws are then bonded into the United States Constitution, which gives the federal government power over all the states. An though the states may assist in immigration enforcement and regulation, it is the federal government that has the full control of enforcing the U.S. immigration laws. Which can result in confusion has how past and future immigration cases are possessed. The federal government has a law that states that if an immigrant commits a felony while on U.S. soil, they will be deported by to the country. But, The U.S. Constitution has a clause, that prevents the state law from interfering or conflicting with the federal immigration laws.

The mirror -image of state enforcement is wonderful—one of the most successful ideas in history. The theory has majority vote that a state carry out federal policy is the Arizona’s Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhood Act, known as the SB 1070. Arizona was known to have “crossed the line” when they decided to regulate the police to check immigration status or if suspect has entered the country illegally, when stopped. Other states have passed similar laws like Oklahoma and Utah, where they do a E-verify check, employment eligibility, voting privileges and impose restrictions on public assistance. The theory has been highly favored by dozens of U.S. senators, representatives, policy groups, private citizens and commentators including Sarah Palin, George Will, and editors of the New York Post and Washington Post.

Currently, to deal with the issues of immigration today, they have come to the idea of building a wall to keep immigrants out of the United States. I personally don’t think this a promising solution to the problem because immigrants would just find other ways to reach land. The wall I feel is just a temporary fix to a long lasting problem, but the current President just wants to be the one to say he fixed the problem or tried to the do something about it.

In a federal republic, there is a division of powers between the national government and the government of individuals, there is no monarch. While each manages their division of powers differently issues of the nation scope are handled at a “federal Level”. The federal republic is used by majority of countries, because it takes almost any form, from aristocracies to democracies.